<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Unlikely Teacher &#187; .NET</title>
	<atom:link href="http://unlikelyteacher.com/tag/net/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://unlikelyteacher.com</link>
	<description>1. Share Everything* [Programming Gotchas, Technology News, Insights on Living and Everything in Between]</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 02:59:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Has .NET Leapfrogged Java?</title>
		<link>http://unlikelyteacher.com/2008/04/23/has-net-leapfrogged-java/</link>
		<comments>http://unlikelyteacher.com/2008/04/23/has-net-leapfrogged-java/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 01:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dotnet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.NET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dayg.wordpress.com/?p=90</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Got this message from my Inbox this morning: Our authors often have great insights. So when one recently told us that .NET technology&#8211;in particular C# combined with LINQ&#8211;has &#8220;leapfrogged Java,&#8221; we took note. His evidence? The new .NET library, LINQ*, provides a direct link between C# code and any data source, without the need for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got this message from my Inbox this morning:</p>
<blockquote>
<div style="text-align:left;">Our authors often have great insights. So when one recently told us that .NET technology&#8211;in particular C# combined with LINQ&#8211;has &#8220;leapfrogged Java,&#8221; we took note. His evidence?</p>
</div>
<ul>
<li>
<div style="text-align:left;">The new .NET library, LINQ*, provides a direct link between C# code and any data source, without the need for a persistence layer like Hibernate.</div>
</li>
<li>
<div style="text-align:left;">C# introduced generics, custom attributes, delegates, standardized foreach iterators, property syntax, and extensible value types before Java.</div>
</li>
<li>
<div style="text-align:left;">The .NET platform now includes Python, Ruby, and new languages like F#, and frameworks like WPF, WCF, and ASP.NET have become industrial-strength.</div>
</li>
</ul>
<div style="text-align:left;"></div>
<p>On the flipside, another of our authors tells us, a language lives in a developer community and Java&#8217;s is more vibrant. Java-to-.NET ports like NAnt, NHibernate and NUnit abound, but there&#8217;s been little movement in the other direction. And .NET still implies Windows.</p>
<p>Have the tables really turned? Join the discussion at <a href="http://rs6.net/tn.jsp?e=001EazZSBL8nMUyX80XWmSilGbQ0-u54CLxyeTEflGQ0xZX9A_b46NgE7Fu4U_5wP3QQhYYceYE2kf46rkWsNJQGAo6I8mTo5-pmap6BmeKr3wE7tkrcnikErSKajKeViec" target="_blank">www.manning.com/leapfrog</a></p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;ll leave it up to you guys to decide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unlikelyteacher.com/2008/04/23/has-net-leapfrogged-java/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
